The First Candid www.newyorker.com 41 points by Thevet 1 day ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...https://web.archive.org/web/20261012120105/https://www.newyo..., https://archive.is/GC1u4
lubujackson 7 hours ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...Since they neglect to show you the full, actual photo. mlmonkey 4 hours ago Why TF would they not show the original??!
programd 7 hours ago For the record this is the actual photo discussed in the articlehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photogr...
donbox 7 hours ago Paywalled :( masfuerte 7 hours ago I didn't notice. I have JS disabled and it just works. embedding-shape 7 hours ago And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp... colesantiago 7 hours ago Why not pay for it then? donbox 6 hours ago I did but not all HN readers can.
embedding-shape 7 hours ago And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
colesantiago 7 hours ago Why not pay for it then? donbox 6 hours ago I did but not all HN readers can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
Since they neglect to show you the full, actual photo.
Why TF would they not show the original??!
For the record this is the actual photo discussed in the article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photogr...
Paywalled :(
I didn't notice. I have JS disabled and it just works.
And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
Why not pay for it then?
I did but not all HN readers can.