I understand if people use LLMs to help them write, but damn make the sentences yours. Please don't have the LLMs write the sentences for you. Use LLMs for outlining, brainstorming, critiquing, grammar, etc. But write your own sentences. This could have been a good article.
Interestingly, I found this one more palatable. Maybe because it avoided some of the other common LLM text pitfalls, like several few-word sentences in a row.
Also I suppose it helps that I was interested in the story of Theo and was happy to keep reading.
Much appreciated. If you are interested, I have written profiles on a few other open source giants like Brendan Eich, Fabrice Bellard, and Richard Stallman on the same personal blog site.
Author here. This is part of a series on the people behind important open source projects that power the Internet infrastructure (previously Brendan Eich, Fabrice Bellard, and Richard Stallman).
I framed it around the XZ backdoor in March 2024 because it's the cleanest illustration of the thesis: OpenSSH was the target, and OpenBSD wasn't exposed. The backdoor reached sshd on Linux through a distro patch that linked in libsystemd (and with it liblzma), not through upstream OpenSSH. That gap between "the code he controls" and "everything bolted on around it" runs through his whole career, from NetBSD in 1994 to the DARPA money in 2003 to LibreSSL after Heartbleed and pledge/unveil.
My argument in the piece is that the personality and the security model are the same thing: the traits that made him hard to work with are why the code holds. I'm sure people here who've used OpenBSD in production or dealt with the project directly will have corrections or nuance, and I'd like to hear them.
I understand if people use LLMs to help them write, but damn make the sentences yours. Please don't have the LLMs write the sentences for you. Use LLMs for outlining, brainstorming, critiquing, grammar, etc. But write your own sentences. This could have been a good article.
Interestingly, I found this one more palatable. Maybe because it avoided some of the other common LLM text pitfalls, like several few-word sentences in a row. Also I suppose it helps that I was interested in the story of Theo and was happy to keep reading.
same, i knew it was written w/some ai assistance, but it was definitely massaged well enough to keep me from closing the tab in disgust.
That was an enthralling read, thank you.
Much appreciated. If you are interested, I have written profiles on a few other open source giants like Brendan Eich, Fabrice Bellard, and Richard Stallman on the same personal blog site.
Longtime fan of OpenBSD since version 2.6 or so. I didn't realize Theo was born in South Africa. I think I assumed he was Dutch.
>Within hours the Linux world was doing triage. Red Hat issued an urgent advisory. Debian rolled back.
FWIW, this issue did not affect Slackware. Slackware tries to use unpatched software plus it does not use systemd.
Good to know! :-)
Author here. This is part of a series on the people behind important open source projects that power the Internet infrastructure (previously Brendan Eich, Fabrice Bellard, and Richard Stallman).
I framed it around the XZ backdoor in March 2024 because it's the cleanest illustration of the thesis: OpenSSH was the target, and OpenBSD wasn't exposed. The backdoor reached sshd on Linux through a distro patch that linked in libsystemd (and with it liblzma), not through upstream OpenSSH. That gap between "the code he controls" and "everything bolted on around it" runs through his whole career, from NetBSD in 1994 to the DARPA money in 2003 to LibreSSL after Heartbleed and pledge/unveil.
My argument in the piece is that the personality and the security model are the same thing: the traits that made him hard to work with are why the code holds. I'm sure people here who've used OpenBSD in production or dealt with the project directly will have corrections or nuance, and I'd like to hear them.