orliesaurus 13 hours ago

Could you include some screenshots in the README of the functionalities? that would go a long way! thank you in advance!

  • aetherspawn 12 hours ago

    Yeah GitHub repos need screenshots.

    • ttul 12 hours ago

      Just have Codex or whatever take the screenshots and post them to the repo. Easy peasy.

      • brazukadev 11 hours ago

        it is more efficient to prompt the meat proxy

  • mirza_rizvi 2 hours ago

    Yep, you're right. I spent way too much time on the setup/deployment side and somehow skipped the obvious part. I'll get some screenshots into the README.

    • tathagatadg 59 minutes ago

      Thanks for making this - like others commenting here, working on something similar, but more for personal email workflow rather than a product. I'd definitely like to give it a spin - the screenshots (ahem video) would be great.

vogje01 1 hour ago

Can you please provide some screenshots and examples issues? It's hard to guess the usability without it.

adobrawy 5 hours ago

Looks great, and something I might try for my project. I am currently at stage of single mailbox, and bunch automation around it.

For example, Google Apps Script trigger Claude Code routine to investigate issue, and draft email ahead of me looking at it. If I do not like draft, I get back to Claude session to fix draft, and make PR to fix prompt for next time.

Curious, why did you choose OpenAI over CloudFlare AI (harness etc.)?

robgough 12 hours ago

I get the temptation to self-host your support platform, as the existing tooling out there can be quite expensive when you want to upgrade from just using an email inbox.

If any founders find themselves reading this, and don't think it's the best idea to self-host your own support infra, I've just spent the last 6+ months building stayupfront.com which has, I think, quite reasonable pricing, and a few more features than this... largely around the customer's portal experience (changelog, roadmap, etc.) and includes monitoring & incident management which I think should all be ran from the same surface.

I've only just soft-launched, so still have founding pricing on there. Would certainly love to speak to others in this space too, as I was surprised how neglected an area it seemed to be when I was trying to find a replacement for jira service desk for a company I was working with at the beginning of this year.

  • ttoinou 8 hours ago

    I dont think the helpdesk / webmail space is saturated, I was looking into this and most of them don’t have the features I need such as automatic LLM assistance, automated translation, sharing tickets among multiple accounts etc.

  • faangguyindia 5 hours ago

    We wrote one in go, htmx and we've been using it for several months now without any issue.

    Helpdesk is easy to build!

gepeake 13 hours ago

Just used a very similar stack to make my own mail client. Workers for routing, Resend for sending, uses a CF and Resend key to set up any inbox on any domain I want ~instantly so I can have inboxes for everything. Very cool, I think workers are underrated!

  • aetherspawn 12 hours ago

    You don’t need resend anymore, email is CF native.

    • xeornet 1 hour ago

      Finally! Hopefully we can stop hearing about Resend. Hyping up an SES wrapper like it's the cure for cancer.

14u2c 12 hours ago

It may be very nice, but with no screenshots and no demo site you're going to have trouble getting people to try it out.

roflchoppa 13 hours ago

Can it kill Jira? That’s all I ask :(

  • ngram 9 hours ago

    For what specific use case would you like to kill Jira?

cpursley 3 hours ago

This is neat, might give it a spin. I've had little luck getting good results from AI bots no matter how grounded they are with good quality context and examples. I actually decided to just build a dead-simple support chat that pipes into Telegram which has worked great for my simple saas support use case. If anyone wants access, just let me know: https://goodsupport.dev

sfraxo 12 hours ago

nice stack. one question from someone who just built one of these: how do you handle inbound email threading? in my case the provider (SES) rewrites the Message-ID in transit, so In-Reply-To/References matching silently breaks. I ended up putting the ticket id in a plus address on the Reply-To, the envelope survives even when the headers don't. also curious how you handle webhook redeliveries, for me duplicates turned out to be the normal case, not the rare one.

  • ttoinou 8 hours ago

    Yeah Im sure threading detection must break at least 30% of the time

    • mirza_rizvi 1 minute ago

      Still a lot of work left to do ofc