alexellisuk 2 hours ago

I was hoping for a whole catalogue of providers - doesn't amp have their own offering here "Orbs"?

So, the interesting part for me was:

"Who runs the fleet Anthropic, its own E2B, rented, third party"

Like that's the only option, a bespoke platform or a rented SaaS for agent sandboxes.

Disclaimer: I am tooting my own horn here - we built SlicerVM.com (Firecracker + Apple Virtualization framework) so that people don't have to pick between those two options.

Especially when you have your own 1500-7000 USD MacBook right under your fingers.

For remote access, (and this happened by accident one night in January) we built superterm.dev - initially as a tmux manager, then as a way to run and monitor agents. Our team sits with 6-24 long running tasks with dictation available, great mobile experience, and can combine both for secure agents + high amounts of feedback.

If anyone's curious - Superterm has a CE edition - free for unlimited personal use. Slicer has a free trial and then a personal edition is available after that.

  • ushakov 18 minutes ago

    Amp’s Orbs run on E2B.

    E2B is fully open-source under Apache 2.0 and runs on GCP, AWS, Azure (preview) and locally on any Linux box that has /dev/kvm (Mac works via Colima, too).

    source: https://github.com/e2b-dev/infra

hypendev 6 hours ago

It's always, firecracker all the way down!

Enjoyed the breakdown, honestly most of the things weren't really surprising.

What was surprising to me was that instinct was just "agent slapped on top of markdown files in git", especially after seeing people talk about it so much. I expected at least a database or a graph or something "smart", but alas, its just three markdowns in a trenchcoat.

  • RohanAdwankar 5 minutes ago

    well to be fair this was just what i could reach inside the sandbox by grepping around if they are doing something else behind the api i wouldnt be able to see it

    in guessing the most important thing to get right for their target usecase is the computer use and from the tools i saw for that the computers they provision were requestable by the subagents so probably something cool going on there

RohanAdwankar 9 hours ago

I took a look inside the VMs that a couple of the agent platforms are using. TLDR is they use firecracker with memory in git. I'm a big fan of the memory in git part it would be cool to see how the git history looks after I use it for a longer period of time. This is my first blog, I'm trying to document things publically as I learn, next I'll look more closely at the providers they are using under the hood (eg. e2b) so feel free to give advice on what to look for!

  • thamizhan2611 7 hours ago

    Do you have an invite to instinct? :)

    • RohanAdwankar 7 hours ago

      yes i think everyone gets 10 did u want one?

      • thamizhan2611 6 hours ago

        Yes, how can I reach out to you to get one :) thanks

      • user_7832 1 hour ago

        Hi, if possible, could I get one too? You can contact me at esquire-zoom-jimmy@duck.com

  • ushakov 3 hours ago

    hey, i work at E2B, happy to answer any questions!

    • htrp 56 minutes ago

      super cool product, any thoughts on adding native llm support to your sandboxes ?

      • ushakov 12 minutes ago

        my thoughts is that Firecracker might be not the best runtime for that, as it’s very minimal on devices it wants to support (famously no PCI out of the box)

  • htrp 21 minutes ago

    How did you find their internal services ?

quietraster 6 hours ago

great breakdown. did you notice meaningful differences in how the platforms handle filesystem persistence between sessions?

  • tensegrist 54 minutes ago
        claude -p "${curl $url}\nreply only with a substantive comment in 'statement. question?' form" | dd conv=lcase
    

    as a service

    i wonder how hard it would be to write a decent classifier for individual comments like this (in practice you can just look at the account history which would make it an easy problem)