geori 25 minutes ago

Lol at "On secondary markets, investors have propelled the company to a $1.5 billion valuation."

  • jasonjmcghee 22 minutes ago

    typo? or did an editor see the original and say "trillion must be a typo"

    • irthomasthomas 8 minutes ago

      I imagine the logprob of b is much greater than t in this context for most models. So 'trillion' gets corrected to the more likely 'billion'.

  • lukan 11 minutes ago

    Fixed it seems.

  • flohofwoe 1 minute ago

    Most likely a typo (fixed by now), but in some (most?) non-English languages billion is the correct word for 10^12 instead of 10^9.

zeafoamrun 8 minutes ago

They should just give engineers PDWs and call it a day.

doughnutstracks 43 minutes ago

At first I read the title as a possible missile strike on Anthropic's office by a hostile actor.

  • wrash-qwtr 3 minutes ago

    If it happened, they better don't run polls for popular support. If the building were empty at the time of the strike, you'd probably get 70% among college students (Luigi had 41%).

mandarinclips 19 minutes ago

Everyone should boycott Anthropic and stop using Claude. I'm starting with myself.

ReptileMan 27 minutes ago

It is not as if they can't write encouraging prompts to mythos from everywhere.

  • dgellow 3 minutes ago

    Imagine a world where 20% of the world compute is allocated to cheerleader-agents encouraging the other agents, and that’s the actual secret recipe to build an AGI

bediger4000 23 minutes ago

Wow, this is bad news. Without in-office collaboration, company culture will collapse. The organic moments of spontaneous synergy won't take place. Perhaps OpenAI or even xAI will take over as leading company. Grim.

  • fluxusars 21 minutes ago

    "Claude, was this sarcasm?"

    - You're absolutely right!

wonderwonder 52 minutes ago

And there goes every single rational for having a security team at the disaster bunkers the billionaires are building

  • bpodgursky 50 minutes ago

    If civilization collapses, the billionaires are correctly assuming the security team will stop following SEIU strike authorization protocol.

    • ceejayoz 45 minutes ago

      They are perhaps incorrectly assuming the security team with all the weaponry will remain loyal to them.

      • bpodgursky 37 minutes ago

        Sure. Who knows.

        But, historically, strongmen/chieftains have not had incredible trouble keeping their goons under control. Most threats from from palace coups not popular revolt. Most normal people in uncertain times like order and aren't going to flip the table on a system that gives them stability, food and shelter.

        • ceejayoz 34 minutes ago

          > But, historically, strongmen/chieftains have not had incredible trouble keeping their goons under control.

          Sure. But some of them seize power from others on their way up via force.

        • nemomarx 21 minutes ago

          Would "one of you promises the security team better conditions if they kill a rival" not be how palace coups usually work?

        • stymaar 5 minutes ago

          > historically, strongmen/chieftains have

          Yup, but those aren't the same people as the one who get to become tech billionaires.

      • john_strinlai 36 minutes ago

        that's probably dependent on the specific genre of collapse we get to enjoy

    • dayvid 30 minutes ago

      Just pay them well enough. Or pay the people at the top a good amount of money to keep the people below in check and have some hope you can rise to the top for a small portion of the people.

      • inigyou 26 minutes ago

        If civilization collapses, money is useless

  • derwiki 46 minutes ago

    They’ll be armed Boston Dynamics robots soon

  • philipallstar 46 minutes ago

    Presumably they'll have stuff there the security team wants.

    • zbentley 43 minutes ago

      Like security guards' families.

      Awful, but not without historical precedent.

      • philipallstar 37 minutes ago

        I did almost write that! But if disaster really strikes, then just resources will be useful.

      • Tade0 27 minutes ago

        Fear the security guard who has nothing to lose.

      • somenameforme 21 minutes ago

        Which precedent?

        Grunts under coercion has a rich history that's still ongoing, but these sort of guards are those that would have both weapons and the guarded in their direct vicinity. I can't think of any historic example where this wasn't the loyalest of the loyal types.

      • stymaar 7 minutes ago

        And who guards the guards family?

        These billionaires who have always relied on the power of the state for their security and asserting their property are absolutely delusional if they think they can keep it without it.

        When states collapse, the one who emerge victorious aren't the well-mannered business people, it's the warlords (a.k.a. the heads of organized crime).

    • deadbunny 24 minutes ago

      The security team have guns and aren't given a 2nd thought, kinda invisible even. They don't need to negotiate.

  • tracerbulletx 44 minutes ago

    There have been plenty of times in history (almost all times) that physically weaker men have secured the loyalty of soldiers with wealth and influence during periods where strong centralized civic authorities did not exist.

    • js8 2 minutes ago

      But the soldiers didn't have the mobile phones then. This was possible by manipulation the information about reality those soldiers had.

      For example, how Mallory can gain power over Alice and Bob who don't directly communicate.

      First, Mallory tells Alice: "I am stronger than you. If you don't do what I say I'll kill you." So Alice decides to submit.

      Then, Mallory takes Alice to Bob and says to him: "Together with Alice we are stronger than you, and kill you if you don't do what I want." So Bob submits.

      This only works if Bob doesn't talk to Alice, otherwise they would together see the empty threat.

      With more people, it becomes a bit trickier but hopefully you see how blocking communication helps to gain power over people. Often the blocking of communication is done through propaganda, e.g. Mallory might entice Alice and Bob to hate each other, so they wouldn't get together and figure he's the manipulator. Or Mallory might just kill someone randomly to motivate people not to talk to each other.

      Anyway, this shows the importance of free speech (which is really a misnomer; it should be called a right to listen). If you can freely talk (and listen) to other people, you reduce your chances to being subjugated by someone.

  • sailfast 19 minutes ago

    Don’t think those folks are union…

bbor 33 minutes ago

The idea of Anthropic allowing a contractor to squeeze such a tiny cost center at such a massive PR cost right before their IPO is just an objective blunder, IMHO. They should've replied to that email with a quick "No, you will be negotiating with the union tomorrow morning. You maybe eventually saving millions right now could cost us literally billions."

  • alephnerd 29 minutes ago

    Ik the building intimately - it's not Anthroptic but the building's security company (which A the pic does not own and is subleasing). SEIU is working to organize Allied Universal in California.

    Support SEIU organizing them (their fighting the good fight in this case), but this specific article is clickbait.

    • forestrywat 26 minutes ago

      So you go to the building owner and say, "give them what they want or we walk." Security team probably doesn't want outrageous changes. Building owner probably just being greedy.

      • alephnerd 24 minutes ago

        You can't in most cases. These buildings are owned by larger conglomerates and are out of scope of landlord-leasee negotiations especially as it's a sublease.

        Allied United is one of the larger security augmentation firms in the nation, which makes is harder. For example, my Alma mater was secured by Allied Universal as well as a dedicated PD because the dedicated PD didn't want to be bag check for a library when they have been dealing with real crime (eg. A comrade in their sister PD across town's was shot by the Boston marathon bombers).

      • t098i3 23 minutes ago

        As I understand it, this union negotiation isn't with a single building, it's with multiple large staffing firms across California

  • kennywinker 27 minutes ago

    Strikes only happen when management has refused to negotiate in good faith already. Usually many times refused.

    • forestrywat 24 minutes ago

      I think the parent poster is saying, "management, get your fucking head on straight and negotiate properly".