It’s formatted strangely… an excerpt from the book at the bottom of the page? The authors don’t match. Or maybe that footnote’s for the images…
It doesn’t need to be any longer; one of the ironic byproducts of our newest computer companions is that, even in the age of short-form content, they produce reams of rubbish, very rarely containing anything of consequence.
Sorry for not trying to be inventive but merely maybe contrarian
I've come to think that one unequivocal upside of "affordable ASI" would be to bring about a world of discourse where discursers would hesitate to think of (not to mention carry) themselves as experts.
[Perhaps it reminds me of Le Guin's thoughts on tech X power, especially as represented in The Dispossessed]
it would seem not just rude, but even snide, to bias your interlocutor towards not carefully verifying the dependencies of your arguments
Widely dispersed and affordable AI would help because it (certainly, imho) makes the alternative, "trust but verify", so easy
And it would be strictly easier than using cloud chatGPT to sow misinformation because there are extra steps in that (--- nonsockpuppets would be inclined to verify the gist of what they are about to say as indeed misleading)
[As a bonus, this seems compatible with TFA, non-ideological anti-anti-intellectualism, and
Where's the rest of the article? Is there a rest of it? It gets to the end of what feels like the introduction, and then just... stops.
It’s formatted strangely… an excerpt from the book at the bottom of the page? The authors don’t match. Or maybe that footnote’s for the images…
It doesn’t need to be any longer; one of the ironic byproducts of our newest computer companions is that, even in the age of short-form content, they produce reams of rubbish, very rarely containing anything of consequence.
This, in contrast, is refreshing.
> (Theme music)
I like this guy already.
Sorry for not trying to be inventive but merely maybe contrarian
I've come to think that one unequivocal upside of "affordable ASI" would be to bring about a world of discourse where discursers would hesitate to think of (not to mention carry) themselves as experts.
[Perhaps it reminds me of Le Guin's thoughts on tech X power, especially as represented in The Dispossessed]
it would seem not just rude, but even snide, to bias your interlocutor towards not carefully verifying the dependencies of your arguments
Widely dispersed and affordable AI would help because it (certainly, imho) makes the alternative, "trust but verify", so easy
And it would be strictly easier than using cloud chatGPT to sow misinformation because there are extra steps in that (--- nonsockpuppets would be inclined to verify the gist of what they are about to say as indeed misleading)
[As a bonus, this seems compatible with TFA, non-ideological anti-anti-intellectualism, and
https://schipper.ai/posts/technical-leaders-should-have-the-...
if we default to assuming that technical leaders should be different (not more, not less) than expert engineers ]