littlecranky67 43 minutes ago

I use Pop_OS! on my old 2014 Macbook Pro (16 GB LPDDR3, i5-4278U with 4 cores). It runs superbly with Gnome3. Given that it is 12 years old now and the latest supported macOS version with opencore legacy patcher was stuttering and unusably slow, there is a second life now for the machine. I mostly use it as a headless home server, the built in battery serves as UPS, keyboard and trackpad make it easier to setup and debug things.

I changed the battery myself (50€ replacement from Amazon) and it looks as good as new (one benefit of the aluminum chassis and glass display is that they can be cleaned quite well). Hardware support from Linux for those intel machines is great nowadays: WiFi, Bluetooth, trackpad etc all work.

haunter 47 minutes ago

And you can go even smaller with TinyCore Linux [0] or the xwoaf-rebuild [1]

0, http://www.tinycorelinux.net/

1, https://web.archive.org/web/20240901115514/https://pupngo.dk...

Honestly it comes down to what do you mean by using Linux. In 2026, or well at least since the mid 2010s, the biggest hurdle will be the web browser. Do you need that? If yes then you are already in the higher system requirement pool. If not then pretty much anything goes, like the options I mentioned above. And even then you can use curl, wget, aria2 etc to access online content to some extent

  • muterad_murilax 17 minutes ago

    > And you can go even smaller with TinyCore Linux or the xwoaf-rebuil

    Sure, but in this time and age, do they really have to settle for such extreme 90s looks as defaults? I mean, Windows XP Media Center Edition can surely be considered as "lightweight" today and it featured the gorgeous Royale theme back in 2005.

    • ladyanita22 7 minutes ago

      Yeah, this is what always surprises me with modern software targeted towards low-specced computers.

      Windows XP run fine in 256MB ram computers yet it could be altered to make it look fantastic, with the Royale or Royale Noir themes.

      I guess even Linux back then could be made beautiful on similarly specced computers. Yet, AntiX or even LxQt is hideous despite consuming more resources!

nasretdinov 30 minutes ago

It's interesting how on a server 2 GiB of RAM can get you quite far, however on a desktop that's pretty much the minimum feasible amount. It used to be the opposite: servers needed plenty of RAM and CPU compared to desktops

applfanboysbgon 4 minutes ago

Don't get your OS recommendations from an LLM-generated article.

linzhangrun 40 minutes ago

For "older but not truly retro" devices, I personally recommend linux mint. I have a fx6100 running it.

Alien1Being 46 minutes ago

OS/2 might also be an option on some of this older hardware.

s3arch 1 hour ago

>The honest assessment: If the machine cannot run a lightweight Linux desktop at a usable speed after you have applied the optimizations in this guide, it is time to recycle it responsibly. Most municipalities have e-waste collection programs. Do not throw it in the trash. The components contain recyclable metals and toxic materials that need proper handling.

This is the whole point.Linux helps in that judgement whether to keep or throw the box.

  • dmzxnico 1 hour ago

    Agree with you.

    Linux itself is a good OS, even better when you have an old machine to "revive". But when even Linux can't run properly, time ditch it...

    • lstodd 58 minutes ago

      If you can't run linux you can always run netbsd. or any *bsd.

      Besides the advice on ditching hardware on account of thermal problems is .. terrible. If you went so far as installing obscure linux distros, surely unscrewing a few screws and applying a vacuum and then some thermal paste isn't out of reach.

  • userbinator 1 hour ago

    Or sell it to the retrocomputing community for a decent amount of $$$.