Scene_Cast2 53 minutes ago

This is the PCPartPicker chart that I monitor: https://pcpartpicker.com/trends/price/memory/#ram.ddr5.5600.... - $900 for 2x32GB, used to be $200 a year ago.

  • fullstop 42 minutes ago

    I regret not building the PC when I was looking at it. It's not a money thing, at the end of the day, but I can't bring myself to do it.

    I had it all priced out, but a bunch of birthdays in my family were coming up and I felt like I shouldn't buy something for myself if it's really their time.

    My old laptop will have to cut it for a while. :-)

  • snkline 42 minutes ago

    The memory in the PC I put together early last year is now worth about three times the total cost of all the parts I used to build the thing. It is absolutely crazy.

axegon_ 57 minutes ago

"The costs are negligible and justified when compared to all the benefits. If you look at the performance gains, the overall cost has in fact been reduced."

- Altman, a.k.a. Dory from Finding Nemo and/or Dario, a.k.a. Carl from Jimmy Neutron.

  • fhdkweig 51 minutes ago

    I haven't watched those movies in a while. Can I get an explanation on those a.k.a.s?

    • z2 47 minutes ago

      I remember both, the former is positive but suffers from short-term memory loss. the latter is always afraid of things, and also seems to never learn.

brnaftr361 50 minutes ago

GN did a documentary on the situation from the perspective of consumer-facing companies. Seems pretty dire for them, and it's hard to see the long-range consequences, but the idea of consumers being priced out isn't too far out, which to me is a little alarming.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zyQwAhppWj8

usui 45 minutes ago

I looked at my eBay receipt in 2023 and I paid $84.98 for a "Kingston FURY Beast 64GB (2x32GB) 3200MHz DDR4" listing and now the equivalent on eBay "Buy It Now" is $374.99 for "Kingston FURY Renegade 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4 RAM 3200MHz (KF432C16RBK2/64)". What a timeline it has become for consumer computing three years later.

  • qingcharles 25 minutes ago

    I was picking up DDR3 16GB sticks for $5/piece on eBay last year. The world has gone mad.

    • Hamuko 11 minutes ago

      To be fair, DDR3 is still kinda cheap. It's really only DDR4 and DDR5 that are massively in demand. DDR3 is a bit too old for it to be in high demand by consumers.

whizzter 21 minutes ago

My bet is that the prices will crash once OpenAI (and/or Antrophic) IPO's have happened.

Right now the biggest threat to their IPO's is that people realize that local models are good enough for whatever they're peddling, what's the most important factor to even running good enough models? RAM since you want the models in memory to not be total slogs.

  • varispeed 15 minutes ago

    > that local models are good enough for whatever they're peddling

    they are not. Unless you are satisfied with plausible, but mostly garbage output.

  • Hamuko 12 minutes ago

    My bet is that we're not gonna see any adjustments in RAM pricing until one of the planned data center projects collapses in a spectacular way.

    • sixothree 6 minutes ago

      And honestly, we will have much bigger problems if that bubble pops in a spectacular fashion.

    • rvnx 5 minutes ago

      One theory: they will need to throw away all these Nvidia cards in the trash at some point right ?

      Because what to do with power-consuming outdated hardware ? let's say 5 years from now ?

      They will need new RAM.

flr03 6 minutes ago

Just looked for my order receipt out of curiosity, this was in Jan 23: £160 for Kingston FURY Renegade 32GB (16GB x 2) 6000MT/s DDR5 CL32 DIMM Silver

functionmouse 22 minutes ago

I'm playing the newest games on ddr3 with a 2080 and a 4790k. It's a simple life.

  • sixothree 8 minutes ago

    I played 100+ hours of RDR2 on a 2060 (non-super), as was the style at the time. When the 30 series came out, I sold that card for more than I paid for it.

  • deaton 6 minutes ago

    I've got a 9 year old Xeon W and 64GB of DDR4. Its not as fast as some modern DDR5 stuff, but boy does it work

alecsm 36 minutes ago

Same thing with storage.

I wanted to upgrade my SSD but prices are more than at the end of 2025. I refuse to pay 500 euro for a 4TB SSD. I rather go outside and play with my bike like when I was 5.

deltoidmaximus 46 minutes ago

AMD just brought the popular 5800X3D back out of retirement to give people maintaining the DDR4 based platforms something to buy. Last I checked used DDR4 was half the price of used DDR5 after the prices of both shot up.

  • dijit 29 minutes ago

    Shame I have 2TiB of ECC DDR4 lying around :(

    Would be nice to be able to own property.

    • varispeed 14 minutes ago

      People used to mock "you'll own nothing" as conspiracy theory.

    • Hamuko 9 minutes ago

      You can probably get a mansion in France for that.

  • onli 15 minutes ago

    Nice, I missed that.

    The 5700X3D has been the smarter pick back then, it fits to the current latent user hostility of AMD to focus on the more expensive processor.

    • silon42 7 minutes ago

      They need to sell something. I bet sales of DDR5 related stuff are down.

matheusmoreira 19 minutes ago

Crazy... I hope this is temporary. If this is the new normal, we're all going to be priced out of computers eventually.

KronisLV 27 minutes ago

Crazy, the other day I looked in my local store order history and say that I bought G.SKILL RipJaws V F4-3600C18D-32GVK, a DDR4 32 GB 3600 MHz kit of two sticks.

I bought it for 82 EUR, before the whole ongoing situation.

Now the same spec costs upwards of 290 EUR, about 3.5x the original price and even on Amazon the best prices I can find are upwards of like 210 EUR (2.5x).

SirFatty 12 minutes ago

No just AI, tariffs also affect price.

tonyrice 11 minutes ago

At one point I remember DDR2 ECC coating like $150-$180

Looking at it from that frame, it seems reasonable.

snarfy 19 minutes ago

I am counting my blessings after updating my and my wife's gaming PCs right before all of this happened.

swiftcoder 39 minutes ago

I bought 64GB of DDR4 in December of '24. Best timing-the-market of my life.

thijson 43 minutes ago

Price should send a signal to manufacturers to build more capacity. I wonder if they will though, it takes quite a bit of time, and it's not certain that the demand will continue to exist once built.

  • mgfist 42 minutes ago

    A fab for high end memory costs $20B and 5 years to build.

    It will happen, but yeah it takes time and money

  • nemomarx 35 minutes ago

    So far haven't we seen the opposite? Consumer focused ram production shutting down to make more volume for server dimms or etc?

    • fluoridation 10 minutes ago

      The bottleneck isn't the sticks, it's the chips. The chips are the same for consumer and server applications. What's been happening is that big companies have bought nearly all the wafer capacity for the next year or so, and perhaps some of that capacity has also been redirected from DDR5 to LPDDR5. If a stick manufacturer drops out of the consumer market that kinda doesn't matter, because manufacturing sticks is comparatively low tech compared to manufacturing the memory chips. You can compare it to manufacturing video cards vs. manufacturing GPUs (as in the actual processing elements).

  • ecshafer 25 minutes ago

    Government needs to get out of the way. Micron announced a memory fab in Syracuse in 2023. It took 3 years, 20,000 pages of "environmental review", deals with the government on amount of union contracts during building, etc. for them to break ground in 2026 for a 2030 opening date. In any reasonable world, a 2023 announcement should have broke ground in 2023.

    • Shitty-kitty 14 minutes ago

      Buddy they ain't building an ice-cream parlor. 200 miles of the Hudson river is a Superfund site. The biggest polluters, PCB's, lead and mercury.

    • otherme123 8 minutes ago

      OTOH, a celulose factory near me, built in the 1950's, got their permits fast and with little regard to environment. FF three decades, and their entire surroundings are destoyed for everyone else. Trials go nowhere, because they have all authorizations needed (and a lot of political leverage because they are the main employer in the region). Careful fast-tracking business that have zero incentives to avoid externalization of costs.

  • varispeed 12 minutes ago

    Why manufacturers would build more capacity to decrease the price (and profits)?

    This is similar situation to housing market. Prices are going up and supply is being restricted by whatever means.

    It will be a bit of Catch 22.

api 21 minutes ago

This is insane. Didn’t know how bad it got. I bought a mini PC a few years ago with 64 gigs in it for a home VM server for like $600 total. Looks like I’m keeping it a while.

Usually these bottlenecks lead to a price crash later. Of course that’s also part of what fuels the bottleneck. Companies are afraid of over investing in production and being left with underwater capital later.

HumblyTossed 10 minutes ago

While back I recalled I had 16GB of DDR4 somewhere. I went and found it in an old bin box. It's now in my safe in case I need it for a machine.

This is the stupidest freaking timeline...

tayo42 40 minutes ago

Take your ram budget, buy micron stock, wait a few days, sell it and buy ram lol

ajsnigrutin 32 minutes ago

"back in my time", a dialup and 32 megs(!) of ram was enough for most stuff, including internet browsing.

I have no idea why a weather forecast site needs tens of megabytes of resources, and gig+ of ram for my browser, since i get no more info from it, than i did back then. Same for chat programs (how is discord different than irc? and why does it need so much ram to do so? same for slack), mail clients, etc.

Maybe it's time to kick developers to start optimizing stuff a bit, since neither they nor the users can't afford "unlimited" ram anymore.

edit: i'm not saying we need to get back to literally 32 megs of ram, just to make developers performance test their stuff on a laptop that was on sale 3 years ago in their local supermarket, i.e. stuff their users use at home.

  • epolanski 22 minutes ago

    People are building static websites with react/tailwind and pretending to be modern. Full of bugs and memory leaks.

    They will even tell you "it's not a static website", thinking that there were no other ways to add dynamic behavior other than using SPAs.

    And they are hiring MIT-bred Leetcode ninjas at 300k+ in most of these startups/big-techs.

Keyframe 48 minutes ago

Can we just go back to pre-AI world?

  • okokwhatever 39 minutes ago

    Can we just go back to pre-{anything-here} world?

    • dijit 36 minutes ago

      gigabit internet and the death of flash for web video has been wonderful to be honest.

      There was a period in 2012-2016 when things were pretty nice.

  • z2 36 minutes ago

    This is textbook negative externalities, of the AI buildout on everyone who isn't using RAM/GPUs for AI, of the use of electricity and water on anyone who isn't using it for AI. The cynic in me thinks this will go down in history alongside asbestos, leaded gasoline/paint, and the opioid crisis.

    • WarmWash 15 minutes ago

      People want this, the demand is there.

      Like clockwork, people naturally want to have their cake and to eat it too, so there will be the incessant complaining about the externalities. Half the people lack the brainpower to see the good and bad are intrinsically linked, and the other half just like complaining.

      But at least for now, both halves aren't pulling back (in fact it's increasing), and money, not complaining, steers the ship.

      • lionkor 6 minutes ago

        > People want this, the demand is there.

        It's impossible to avoid using AI multiple times a day, just because it's forced into every product under the sun.

        That is NOT demand. None of those users WANT this.

  • whizzter 25 minutes ago

    It'll calm down once the Antrophic and/or OpenAI IPO's are done, no need to protect themselves from people running local models by buying everything once the bosses have gotten their money.

    • pizza234 8 minutes ago

      OpenAI and Anthropic are certainly strong drivers, but there's a large demand from many other players: cloud provider, accelerator vendors, and so on. I think there's no end in sight.

Forgeties79 58 minutes ago

Honestly that seems slightly down even if it’s still ridiculous. The ram I bought for $100 a year ago was $500 a couple of months ago. Could just be the particular sticks I got though

  • john_strinlai 54 minutes ago

    $375 is the cheapest kit, and the price is using a promo code

    "Price tracking courtesy of PCPartPicker now reveals the cheapest 32GB DDR5 RAM you can buy is $375. Specifically, four XPOWER kits from Silicon Power will set you back $374.97 thanks to a promo code."

    • Forgeties79 9 minutes ago

      that’s what I get for not clicking through TFA

  • moomoo11 43 minutes ago

    i have 128gb ddr4 from a few years ago. i think i paid like 300-400 for it.

    its paired to a 5950x so im sure it will be fine for a few more years