deanc 5 minutes ago

I don't see the problem here. It's a great product and if they want to make money then I don't mind. If it's too expensive, and they hike the price to something ridiculous then I'll vote with my wallet.

flossly 9 minutes ago

I use BitWarden because I'd never trust a password manager with close source clients. Before BitWarden I used a local manager: BitWarden made my life easier.

The web interface I'd never use: I have no guarantee that my passphrase does not leave my computer. Same for the import feature: this also requires the passphrase to be sent to their servers.

Needless to say I move to the next ethical e2ee password manager if BitWarden turns it's back on open source.

cglan 14 minutes ago

I don't think these companies are obligated to run a free tier. Someone has to pay the infra. It's a little shady that they didn't announce any of this though. But bitwarden is open source and you can host it all yourself

megamike 1 day ago

what are some bitwarden alternatives?

  • RockstarSprain 17 minutes ago

    Proton Pass. Not ideal but actively developing and IMO its UX is way better than what I had with Bitwarden.

  • arbitrarian 11 minutes ago

    Keepass or one of its variants are great. Pair it with a shared folder via SyncThing/GDrive/Dropbox/whatever and you'll be set.

  • gonzalohm 8 minutes ago

    Depends on what you are looking for. I use keepass to store my password + syncthing to sync across devices