JSeiko 2 hours ago

Hi! I'm one of the programmers at Gutenberg. We've been improving the site a lot over the past few months (and more is coming!). If you haven't visited the page recently, it's worth checking out again: https://www.gutenberg.org/

  • Falimonda 2 hours ago

    The book list elements on front page render as both horizontally and vertically scrollable divs on mobile - seems like an opportunity for improvement.

    Keep up the good work!

    • JSeiko 2 hours ago

      good feedback thanks! Doing an iteration on the homepage design is actually pretty high on the priority list. will keep your feedback in mind!

  • samcollins 2 hours ago

    Very cool! Do you have a recommended way for an agent to see an index of the books and epub links?

    (I can’t quite tell if that’s an egregious abuse of the site or you’re perfectly fine to share without human eye balls hitting your www?)

    • e0d075b569cd 2 hours ago

      brother ... are we really THAT stupid now?

    • JSeiko 2 hours ago

      not yet, but that's not a bad idea imo. Dealing with Ai crawler traffic is definitely a challenge if that's what you were referring to.

    • ancientcatz 2 hours ago

      OPDS?

      • gluejar 1 hour ago

        OPDS 2.0 coming RSN. email us if you want to test. OPDS 0.x is currently available (not recommended) by adding .opds to the end of a url

    • jzs 2 hours ago

      Now i'm not associated with gutenberg in any form, but they do have a page for offline consumption:

      https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/offline_catalogs.html

      Perhaps you can find the information you are looking for there.

      However if you plan on scraping or otherwise hitting them with a ton of traffic, consider at least to donate a good amount for the traffic you cause them. It ain't free after all.

      • JSeiko 1 hour ago

        Donations are always appreciated ;)

    • samcollins 1 hour ago

      Thanks for the answers! Found it:

      > All Project Gutenberg metadata are available digitally in the XML/RDF format. This is updated daily (other than the legacy format mentioned below). Please use one of these files as input to a database or other tools you may be developing, instead of crawling or roboting the website.

      And strongly consider a donation! (My addition)

      https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/offline_catalogs.html#the-p...

  • xrd 1 hour ago

    Thank you for your work. This site is an international treasure.

  • ExtremisAndy 1 hour ago

    Oh, my! This does look nice. Thank you for your hard work!

    • JSeiko 1 hour ago

      Thanks! We're currently working on a design update of the page of any specific book. Should be online soon (next 1-2 weeks or so)

  • excitednumber 1 hour ago

    Thank you for being one of the best places on the internet

  • shuvrojit 1 hour ago

    Great Work. Thank you. I'm also a programmer. If you are ever short on help, let me know. I would love to contribute.

  • smallnix 1 hour ago

    There's a minor bug with chrome in android where the menu will not close when you tap outside the menu or on the menu link/button

    • JSeiko 1 hour ago

      will open an "Issue" for it

    • JSeiko 1 hour ago

      I've messaged the guy who's best suited to fixing this. He'll be on it this weekend

  • BiraIgnacio 1 hour ago

    Thanks so much for the work you and your team do!

  • TimorousBestie 45 minutes ago

    Wanna let you know you’re doing great work and you have my dream job, thanks to the team for everything!

    • JSeiko 31 minutes ago

      it's not my day job. PG is open-source. I'm "just" a contributor

  • jefurii 41 minutes ago

    When I thought about Project Gutenberg I remembered that original brutalist non-design. The current site has been very tastefully updated but looks like it's still very accessible if you turn styles off. Great job!

    • JSeiko 32 minutes ago

      sadly HN doesn't have a "heart" emoji I could use :D

throw0101c 1 hour ago

While PG has probably gotten a lot of use and growth with the growth/maintreaming of the Internet since the 1990s, (TIL) it started back in 1971:

> Michael S. Hart began Project Gutenberg in 1971 with the digitization of the United States Declaration of Independence.[5] Hart, a student at the University of Illinois, obtained access to a Xerox Sigma V mainframe computer in the university's Materials Research Lab. […] This computer was one of the 15 nodes on ARPANET, the computer network that would become the Internet. Hart believed one day the general public would be able to access computers and decided to make works of literature available in electronic form for free. […]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Gutenberg

  • gluejar 41 minutes ago

    wikipedians, please help update this article.

gluejar 57 minutes ago

Nice to see so much appreciation for what we do. (I'm the new-ish executive director.) Any wikipedians reading this, the article about PG is... aging. Last I looked, it said we offered Plucker files. @Jseiko has done some nice work.

Someone1234 1 hour ago

I'm surprised no eBook Reader vendor has a Project Gutenberg "Store." Where you can just browse Gutenberg, find a book, and just grab it down to the reader. Instead, they either are actively hostile (Kindle), or require the use of Calibre (which itself is good, it is just the friction).

  • JSeiko 1 hour ago

    I've heard that the newest Kobo e-readers have a browser that you could use to go to gutenberg.org and directly download files.

    but yes, generally I agree with your point. Library of 75k books seems pretty valuable to have direct access to.

  • horsawlarway 1 hour ago

    I've used https://standardebooks.org/ to pull nicely formatted Project Gutenberg books on any e-reader that supports a browser (in my case, Boox).

    Technically, I can also just directly pull the epub from Project Gutenberg, but sometimes the formatting leaves a lot to be desired.

    Once you get an e-reader that runs a semi-capable OS (ex - stock android, even an older version), it's hard to go back to something like a kindle.

  • cstever 1 hour ago

    No money for them.

  • WillAdams 54 minutes ago

    Used to be one could sort of get that with the Project Librivox:

    https://librivox.org/

    e-book app Gutebooks (in addition to their audio app), but it seems to have been deprecated (I'm no longer able to connect to the server on my copy (which I only got 'cause there was an in-app purchase to fund Project Librivox).

    FWIW, Barnes & Noble has been plundering the public domain using a book composition/keying house in the Philippines to make their public domain books which they make available in their stores --- Amazon apparently has a similar setup for the Kindle Store:

    https://www.amazon.com/Public-Domain-Books-Kindle-Store/s?k=...

    Rather a shame that PG didn't monetize by putting their books up there pre-emptively.

    • JSeiko 38 minutes ago

      the way I see it PG is a labor of love. Bit odd if Barnes & Noble or whoever piggyback off it. But in the end - the more people read the books, the better.

      • WillAdams 10 minutes ago

        It is a public good, and it would be appropos if corporations would support it directly rather than work at cross-purposes to it.

        If Amazon is going to sell public domain texts, then it would make sense to source them from PG, and fund some money from those sales to the non-profit, similarly, they could then funnel reports of typos to PG for review and correction (it was a bit of a struggle the last time I tried to get a text corrected, and the project founder/director actually stepped in on my behalf).

  • daveoc64 53 minutes ago

    You can download books directly from the Project Gutenberg website using the web browser on most eBook readers - even the Kindle supports it.

ssgodderidge 26 minutes ago

Looks like the top downloaded book yesterday[0] was Concrete Construction: Methods and Costs by Gillette and Hill.[1] Beat out Moby Dick, Count of Monte Cristo, Frankenstien, Romeo and Juliet, and others.

> 23644 downloads in the last 30 days.

I wonder if this is bot behavior? 23k downloads feels like a lot?

[0] https://www.gutenberg.org/browse/scores/top [1] https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/24855

  • JSeiko 20 minutes ago

    bot traffic would be my guess too. I doubt there was a sudden global spike in interest in "Concrete Construction Methods" :D

JKCalhoun 1 hour ago

Project Gutenberg had (has?) a tendency toward plaintext that always put me off. (And it has been over a decade I'm sure since I explored the site—so I am no doubt now misinformed.)

I like a styled formatted book—would prefer PDFs. (I know, not a popular format apparently.)

I like the idea of Project Gutenberg but guess I found book scans on archive.org my preference.

My go-to example is Lewis Carroll's "Through the Looking Glass" with the fantastic art of John Tenniel and Carroll's sometimes creative formatting of the prose…

I see they (Project Gutenberg) have ePub now, which can be good if well done.

(If not well done it can be a kind of mess. Re-flowable "HTML", paginated… Anyone ever try to print a long web page and did you enjoy the result? Perhaps that is as much on the ePub reader though.)

  • graemep 1 hour ago

    I have got quite a few books over the years from Gutenberg, and the epubs have been fine 0 even of illustrated ones.

  • RattlesnakeJake 1 hour ago

    Check out Standard eBooks. They take the text from Gutenberg and add a level of polish to the ePubs.

  • JLO64 1 hour ago

    As others here have mentioned, https://standardebooks.org/ is excellent and my understanding is that they use Gutenberg books as a source for theirs but done up much nicer.

  • jiffygist 1 hour ago

    I on the other hand prefer epubs for fiction. I mostly read on the phone.

  • JSeiko 1 hour ago

    We're supporting EPUB3 for the vast majority of books! At the same time we also have a "Plain Text" version for each as in a sense it's the most robust. PdFs are in the works!

  • the_af 1 hour ago

    I like plain text. You can always post process it into any other format you prefer.

    • JSeiko 33 minutes ago

      it's also very "accessible" - good for assistive technologies and people with "ou-of-the-ordinary" requirements

  • gluejar 1 hour ago

    PDF coming this year.

  • skrtskrt 1 hour ago

    The common issue with PDFs is that e-readers generally have terrible support for them.

RattlesnakeJake 1 hour ago

As a Kindle user, I still miss the old version of the site. The new one looks great on normal desktop, but the old one was simple enough to load and directly download books on the device's built-in browser.

  • JSeiko 1 hour ago

    That's interesting. What about the new design prevents you from doing it? Genuinely asking here. We may fix it if it's actionable

    • RattlesnakeJake 1 hour ago

      And now it's time to put my foot in my mouth. I haven't used it in a while because it was frustrating, but you guys seem to have already fixed it :)

      The previous version of the site had two major flaws:

      1. The search bar had been removed from the top of the page, and hidden behind a "Click here to search" (or similar) link partway down the page

      2. Once you opened that page, the coloring of the site was so washed out on e-ink that the text input was hard to find.

      Thanks for fixing it!

      • JSeiko 1 hour ago

        "you guys seem to have already fixed it" - that's what we like to hear :)

  • graemep 1 hour ago

    Is that a Kindle issue?

    You can download books in most browsers. I know Amazon have done things to make life difficult for other stores in the past.

smilespray 47 minutes ago

I remember printing out project Gutenberg books in the mid-90s, four regular pages to an A4 page, double-sided on my inkjet. I had a background in typography, so I made it work.

Any yes, the text needed a lot of processing to make it right.

Now, in my early fifties and with declining eyesight, that's out of reach now.

Thanks for sticking with the project!

  • JSeiko 19 minutes ago

    that's cool! one of my "pet-ideas" is actually to make an AI-agent that does all that typographical work for any PG book to make it nicely printable without any manual labor whatsoever. Maybe that's doable now ...

seizethecheese 2 hours ago

A big pet peeve of mine with Project Gutenberg was the lack of mobile styling. Looks like it’s been fixed! Awesome.

  • JSeiko 1 hour ago

    good to hear - that was a lot of work!

monegator 14 minutes ago

I keep getting PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR

  • JSeiko 11 minutes ago

    I've reported it.

autoexec 19 minutes ago

I love how usable the site is even with JS disabled!

oidar 58 minutes ago

I'm slightly curious how PG handles heavily illustrated books. I've downloaded some years ago, and the quality of the illustrations was always pretty poor. Has it been improved lately? What's the QA like for illustrations?

  • gluejar 49 minutes ago

    Nowadays we depend on scans from Internet Archive, Hathitrust, and other sources. Some scans are better than others. Bear in mind that our illustrations need to be in the public domain and usually from the same edition as the text. https://www.gutenberg.org/help/errata.html

bryankaplan 52 minutes ago

I find it interesting that the context of this comments page apparently overrides the normal definition of “PG” on HN.

  • JSeiko 50 minutes ago

    :D

    • JSeiko 49 minutes ago

      personally I'm a fan of the other "PG" as well.

AndrewStephens 58 minutes ago

PG remains one of the best things on the internet. The amount of fascinating material almost beggers belief.

  • JSeiko 51 minutes ago

    the amount of weird/interesting stuff that one would find nowhere else is possibly the coolest aspect of PG imo

aronhegedus 1 hour ago

Recently downloaded Moby Dick from here:) very easy to use

  • JSeiko 1 hour ago

    Moby Dick is consistently one of the Top Downloads

kgwxd 41 minutes ago

How did "Concrete Construction: Methods and Costs" come to be the #1 download?

  • JSeiko 36 minutes ago

    good question. first though - maybe some bot has downloaded it often for whatever reasons and our systems didn't detect it as bot traffic. just a guess.

taubek 2 hours ago

Thank you for reminding me about this project. Didn’t visit it in a long time.

brcmthrowaway 1 hour ago

I can't read anymore due to fear of not being productive with AI

  • JSeiko 1 hour ago

    maybe there's a way to read more productively using AI: https://x.com/karpathy/status/1990577951671509438

    could be a trick to ease that fear :D

    • zozbot234 11 minutes ago

      I've found that the larger open-weight AI models do a great job of explaining the old non-fiction content on PG, particularly magazine articles which are a good size for the AI to handle. It breaks down the long wall-of-text paragraphs for you and explains all the historically relevant background that would've been assumed to be known back in the day.

      If you ask it to assess the relevance of the text in the present day it will also do that very nicely, highlighting the places where the text shows old-fashioned viewpoints that would be sharply criticized today.