This is great. I sort of feel a lack of fora for discussing technical books over a longer lifetime than merely say, the HN front page.
While there is a very good selection of readings, it's unfortunate that both LinkedIn and Google are being used here, especially if the discussion is text-only.
This is great. I sort of feel a lack of fora for discussing technical books over a longer lifetime than merely say, the HN front page.
While there is a very good selection of readings, it's unfortunate that both LinkedIn and Google are being used here, especially if the discussion is text-only.
People like me may be more interested in this blog post:
https://notes.eatonphil.com/2024-05-30-how-i-run-book-clubs....
Lol, requires LinkedIn and can't parse valid email addresses. This is what senior+ software development looks like.
It looks amazing as a reading list. I am also reading the OS book by Tanenbaum since the three piece book got very boring after a bit of reading
"High Performance Browser Networking"
I wish there was an update to this book, reading it a while back I think it covered some proposed HTTP/2 features but definitely not HTTP/3.
Many of the issues discussed had to do with TCP itself.
I would love to see a maths version of this bookclub
Well I don’t have Linkedin so that’s a shame. The idea is very good.
I expect if you use www.linkedin.com/i-do-not-have-linkedin as the URL Phil will let you in anyway.
I wonder if someone could be arrested for gaining unauthorized access to a computer system via fraud under US law for doing that.
What? How?
The computer fraud and abuse act is extremely broad to the point of absurdity.
confirmed
(I help host nycsystems w/ Phil- we don't mind, just an easier way to know who is who other than email)
My sentiment too: a nice idea worth supporting but the execution has something to improve. In addition to LinkedIn: