I think a much larger concern is that political activists have fully committed to using the open nature of Wikipedia to slant articles in their favoured direction. Unfortunately, the public and other consumers of Wikipedia have been slower to catch on, resulting in a slow poisoning of what was once accurate knowledge about the world.
I think a much larger concern is that political activists have fully committed to using the open nature of Wikipedia to slant articles in their favoured direction. Unfortunately, the public and other consumers of Wikipedia have been slower to catch on, resulting in a slow poisoning of what was once accurate knowledge about the world.
Man, people are really trying to fast track the stupidifcation of the world.
“Why isn’t Wikipedia more like tik tok” is certainly a take.
At Age 25, Wikipedia Refuses to Evolve The digital commons champion faces a crisis of its own making
It's a fucking encyclopedia in HTML with revision control. The only crisis we have is the stupidity crisis pushing for change.