"Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting."
I get it, I do, and I'm a good boy around here as much as humanly possible, but this ain't no ordinary level of back-button-evil. There were hundreds of back-button edits. It was quite uncommon and interesting, IMO.
The question is, at what point does user-hostile site behavior become more than tangential? Surely if, for example, a page contained malware that would warrant at least a mention in the comments. Personally I appreciated your warning.
I get it, I do, and I'm a good boy around here as much as humanly possible, but this ain't no ordinary level of back-button-evil. There were hundreds of back-button edits. It was quite uncommon and interesting, IMO.
Thanks for what you do here, too, btw.
The question is, at what point does user-hostile site behavior become more than tangential? Surely if, for example, a page contained malware that would warrant at least a mention in the comments. Personally I appreciated your warning.